First Concepts.
WOB is Optimal
You wonder what is the latest definition of normoglycemia,
and turn to the medical oracle,
known as Evidenced Based
Medicine (EBM). EBM derives information
from clinical trials and comes up with the following definition: Normal
fasting glucose level 3.3 -
6.7 mmol/l (60-100 mg /100ml). Some experts are somewhat cautious, and regard
the glucose level range 5.6 - 6.7 mmol/l as impaired with a greater risk
of developing diabetes mellitus.
In order to estimate the normal glucose level, EBM epidemiologists
measure fasting glucose in a group of healthy individuals, and get a distribution of values
which fluctuate around a mean. Any value in the range of two standard deviations (SD) from the
mean, is regarded as normal. Values
below are hypoglycemic, and above, hyperglycemic. (This estimate requires
a log-normal transformation).
How do these experts know that their patients were healthy?
They examined them thoroughly and then asked them the crucial question:"Do
you feel healthy?" And yet in this healthy population some had already
impaired blood glucose values.
Tachycardia
Next day you wonder what would be the normal resting heart
rate of a male. EBM experts come with the right answer: 60 - 80 /min. Any
value below two SD of the mean is bradycardia, and above, tachycardia. You look at your patient with a heart
rate of 110/ min and ask the
EBM expert:"Is his heart rate abnormal?", "Of course not!"
he answers benevolently, "Don't you realize that he is worried?" Yet this wise guy does not realize that
his argument is flawed. He broadened
the context in which the significance
of heart rate was considered. When EBM estimated the normal heart distribution
it disregarded whether healthy
subjects were worried or not. And since
some may have been, their estimates may be flawed. According to EBM this
heart rate is abnormal. This example illustrates the contradiction between
a definition of a normal value based in population studies, and clinical
observation.
Context fallacy
A context fallacy occurs when a theory or a statement valid in a narrow context is applied
(extrapolated) to a different
or wider context. Here the narrow context
in which the normal heart rate is defined
is a frequency distribution of values. How each patient feels, was
not examined, and belongs to
a wider context
. Similar flaws accompany many
EBM directives. Clinicians avoid such traps with common sense, however
in chronic diseases context fallacies are more subtle.
Hyperglycemia
How many healthy and worried patients contributed to the
so called impaired glucose levels? Yet experts regard these healthy glucose values indicate a greater
risk of developing diabetes! You
might never meet these 'high
risk' patients since they feel healthy. Should they be screened preventively?
After all experts suggest to
check their blood glucose more often. Which illustrates another outcome of the context fallacy. Since
EBM definition of normal is
inadequate, borderline cases are suspicious. Some are even proclaimed to be sick, which has some
harrowing consequences. Such a 'high risk' individual applies for a job
and is told that she is diabetic and will therefore pay a higher life insurance
premium.
Biological variation
What went wrong?
Since each individual is different
he has also a slightly different blood sugar value. Epidemiology
calls it biological variation, which is conveniently summarized by two parameters,
mean and SD. The fallacy
occurs when EBM equates this mean with
normality, like in normoglycemia.
Biological variation means that all different blood sugar levels are equally normal
and healthy. The distribution
is a spectrum of normal glucose levels, and its mean is not more
normal than the other values.
Machine statistics
Yet EBM fails to see it that way. Like physics it attributes
variation to chance and regards
it as an error. Like physics
it applies the normal distribution function (and its transforms) to describe
medical phenomena, and regards the mean as the only correct or normal value,
anything else is an error. By equating mean with normality,
EBM perpetuates a fallacy with a damaging
consequences on therapy.
Further reading:
Meta analysis
and Chaos
The normal and he pathological
A simple model
We are concerned here with type-2
diabetes mellitus, and shall illustrate the following arguments on a
simple model. Blood glucose level is driven by a demand
for it by organism,
and is controlled by WOB. A
glucose molecule is born upon entering
blood circulation, and dies when leaving
it. Glucose birth rate is also its production, and death rate is
glucose utilization. The terms
birth and death in relationship with glucose are preferred over production
and utilization, since glucose turnover is regarded here as a process, and
these terms are suitable for describing
processes.
When mind is worried, like in the patient described above, it instructs
WOB to raise glucose birth rate (production).
WOB controls all processes and
adjusts them to meet the requirements of the organism. It is constrained
by environment and mind. When it gets cold WOB turns the heat on ,
and vice versa. WOB responds also to the mind, which receives
signals and directives from society (culture). The adjustment of processes
at any instant is called WOB solution. It is always the most optimal
solution in the circumstances.
This is the modern interpretation of Galen’s principle: Nothing
is done by Nature in vain.
Rising normoglycemia
Moderate hyperglycemia is WOB
solution to patient's worries. Since worrying, he needs more glucose, otherwise
WOB would produce less. This optimality principle underlies also the evolution
of diabetes mellitus. At any instance WOB adjusts glucose production to
the requirement by the organism.
Diabetes mellitus results from a rising
demand for sugar by the brain. An ongoing
sugar craving by the brain. What appears
to the observer as a rising hyperglycemia, is an evolution of optimal solutions.
Diabetes mellitus is a rising
normoglycemia.
Diabetes mellitus proceeds through
two phases:
1. Full compensation when glucose birth and death rates are high and equal and patient feels healthy.
2. Decompensation, when glucose birth and death rates are high and death
rate is lower than birth rate. Patient
feels sick, and suffers from secondary manifestations like polyuria, acidosis, infections, and other complications.
Rising demand for glucose
by the brain drives the disease. Although its cause is still unknown, one might
consider a latent infection, or an impeded blood flow due to arteriosclerosis.
Either brain cells require more glucose for their activity, or they do not
get enough glucose, (a receptor deficiency), and require an ever increasing
glucose throughput.
Full compensation
The disease starts with rising
glucose birth and death rates. Initially they are equal and blood glucose
level does not change. Next, brain
starts demanding a higher throughput and glucose level rises. Then
comes polyuria, and disease enters its second phase. Clinical manifestations
are interpreted here from WOB perspective.
When WOB fails to supply enough
glucose to the brain, it signals the mind a sense of hunger as if saying:
"Get more glucose!" Concomitantly WOB catabolizes tissues, and
patient loses weight. Now organs
require less sugar, and more is left for the brain. In order to divert even
more sugar to the brain WOB signals weakness and fatigue as if saying:"
Lie down!" Organs utilize
less glucose (energy) and the surplus is diverted to the brain.
From WOB perspective it's
main task is to prevent hypoglycemia,
and when it fails, patient will faint, and brain will require less glucose.
Decompensation
As glucose level rises, patient suffers from polyuria.
WOB sends to mind a thirst
signal, as if saying: "I lose control of water resources, get me water!"
In order to increase blood flow through
the brain WOB raises blood pressure. Prevalence rates of hypertension among
diabetics are between 40% and 75%.
Rising blood glucose impairs
tissue function, known as glucose toxicity. Rising hypertension and glucose toxicity will
determine the intensity of other complications, e.g., neurpathy, nephropathy,
and cardiovascular events.
All along disease progression, WOB solution remains
the most optimal under circumstances.
In order to keep the patient alive it has to give up peripheral processes,
otherwise patient will die. WOB task is to maintain life at all
cost. Even
a stroke may be regarded as WOB effort to divert more glucose to the brain.
Secondary polycythemia
This way to explain the nature of diabetes mellitus is
somewhat unusual. Yet similar considerations apply to many chronic diseases.
The following thought experiment illustrates a relationship
between demand and outcome in secondary polycythemia. The sixty years old astronomer named
Carlos, is asked to work in an observatory high in the Andes. He enters
a lift which will bring him there. The voyage lasts about three weeks during
which he cannot leave the lift, neither stop it. (A similar lift was applied
by Einstein to explain his theory of relativity).
As the lift starts ascending, air becomes thinner, and
oxygen scarcer. Since oxygen is carried by red blood cells (RBC) we shall
follow their fate as Carlos approaches the summit.
His condition proceeds through two phases:
1. Full compensation when RBC birth and death rates are high and equal and patient feels healthy (normocythemia).
2. Decompensation, RBC birth and death rates are high and death rate is
lower than birth rate (polycythemia).
Patient feels sick, and suffers from secondary manifestations, like tachypnea,
acidosis, infections (bronchitis), and other complications.
Oxygen demand by the brain
drives his condition.
Full compensation
RBC birth
and death rates rise. Initially they are equal and RBC level does not change (normocythemia). As oxygen becomes scarce, brain requirements for it remain the same,
and RBC level rises (polycythemia). Then comes tachypnea, and disease enters
its second phase. Clinical manifestations are interpreted from WOB perspective.
When WOB fails to supply brain with sufficient oxygen, it signals the mind a sense of choking as if saying: "Get
more air!" Concomitantly WOB catabolizes tissues, and patient loses
weight. Now organs require
less oxygen, and more is left for the brain. In order to divert even more
oxygen to the brain WOB signals mind
weakness, fatigue, and prostration, as if saying: "Lie down!" Organs use less oxygen (energy) and the rest is diverted to the brain.
From WOB perspective it's
main task is to prevent brain anoxia,
and when it fails, patient will faint, and brain will require less oxygen.
Decompensation
In order to increase blood flow through the brain WOB
raises blood pressure. Rising hypertension, blood viscosity , and patient's
arteriosclerosis, will determine the intensity of other complications, e.g.,
cardiovascular events, nephropathy, and bronchitis.
All along his ascent toward the observatory WOB solution
remains the most optimal under
circumstances. In order to keep the patient alive it has to give
up peripheral processes, otherwise patient will die. WOB task is to maintain
life at all cost. Even a stroke may be regarded as WOB effort
to divert more oxygen to the brain.
More on Carlos' condition read: On Cause and
Etiology of Disease
Such an explanatory
narrative is applicable also to essential hypertension, Parkinson's
disease and some other chronic diseases.
Therapy
WOB solutions do not meet the patient's (mind) expectations,
who wants a better life. The physician
has two main responsibilities: To help where WOB failed, and to improve
patient's quality of life, without
interfering too much with WOB solutions. He has to work out a compromise between WOB
and mind demands. Since patient cannot be cured, the main objective is to slow down disease progression. The two major threats to the patient are hypertension and glucose
toxicity. Any attempt to lower hypertension and glucose endangers the patient.
Physician ought therefore attempt to lower glucose demand
by periphery.
During sleep demand
for glucose is the lowest. Patient should therefore be encouraged to sleep
at least eight hours. He may have learn how to sleep that long. A meditating
patient may attain a sleep like condition while maintaining his full consciousness.
Her muscles relax, heart beats slower, and so is breathing . Demand
for glucose declines. Meditation has yet another advantage. Patient learns
how to manage his worries and ignore the negative impact on himself by society and culture. Meditation
reduces the demand for glucose. It introduces the patient to a new
life. From now on his mission is to learn how to live with diabetes
mellitus.
Sport
Is risky, however has many
advantages. Body building is not advised since it increases demand for glucose. Aerobic exercises may
be helpful, since organism learns how to conserve oxygen and utilize
less glucose. Aerobics improve blood circulation particularly in the brain,
and may lower the demand for blood throughput which will lower also
blood pressure and blood glucose level.
Cerebral blood flow
Diminished cerebral blood flow
may be the main driving force of diabetes mellitus. Mild muscular activity
increases cerebral blood flow. When a muscle is activated, brain neurons
controlling it get more blood. This
activity ought
to be gradual so as not to endanger the patient. It seems that ancient Chinese martial
arts might be appropriate for such a task.
Diet
Insulin
While juvenile diabetes (Type-1) is caused by insulin deficiency, type-2
diabetics don't lack insulin, since islet cells are intact. Only WOB resists
its application.
The yogi suffix
signifies people capable of living with their disease in harmony,
and slow down disease progression.
(v. Cancer-Yogi .
Suppose one could diminish
glucose demand by the brain, it might diminish its dependency on
glucose blood level, and slow down disease progression. Meditation has such
a merit. It introduces the patient into a new way of life.
From now on his mission is to become an insulin-yogi.